International students shouldn't have to suppress opinions

Marina Shafran
senior, psychology

Dear Editor

In Alex B. Berezow's column "Be ungrateful and blame America first: part II," Mr. Berezow accuses the professors criticizing his work for being selective in their understanding of freedom of speech.

I, however, believe that Mr. Berezow does the same when he selectively describes America's role in history. Don't get me wrong, freedom of the speech is very important, but still, Mr. Berezow needs to broaden or at least update his knowledge and perspective on history.

Not having any need or obligation to rebuild Japan? One may think it would be required after dropping two atomic bombs on a country!

Getting rid of Hitler? That is very interesting, and I suppose all the countries that were involved in World War II before America even joined had nothing to do with it?

Moreover, the great humanitarian support Mr. Berezow refers to; is it unconditional and free? Or does the American government requires something in return?

Mr. Berezow should consider this: The international students are appreciative of the opportunity they have received to come and study in the United States. This, however, does not mean they need to keep their mouths shut throughout their stay in the United States and suppress their feelings of disagreements if they have any.

This freedom of the speech Mr. Berezow refers to? Does this include international students as well? Or do they need to keep quiet because they are not part of the country?

Marina Shafran
senior, psychology

Copyright 2009 - Daily Egyptian