Rift remains between Faculty Association and administration
Geoffrey Ritter Daily
Egyptian
Two years ago, Morteza Daneshdoost felt unwanted.
As the president of the Faculty Association, he had traveled to
Springfield to help lobby for SIUC's budget. Once he had taken the
podium and began addressing the legislature, he felt everything was
going well.
Then he saw two people get out of their seats, turn around and leave the
room.
They were SIU President James Walker and SIUC Chancellor Walter Wendler.
Ever since then, Daneshdoost has taken that moment as a symbol of what
the Faculty Association means to the SIU administration.
"The fact that they left was an insult," Daneshdoost said of the event
now. "They keep us away, but we should work together on the mission of
the University. Whenever we extend a hand, they slap it."
Admittedly, things have changed a bit since that day. Almost two years
ago came the tense negotiations between the faculty and administration
that almost threw the University into the abyss of a faculty strike, a
moment that would have made history among Illinois universities. In the
end, the moment never came. An agreement was reached, and a contract
stretching into 2006 was established.
For the moment, the crisis was settled.
Accordingly, both groups have since moved on. Without the arguing
between the two entities, Wendler has been able to focus more on the
goals of Southern at 150, and the association has been able to move on
to the standard grievances that constantly flow in from University
faculty.
There are lots of them, said Marvin Zeman, a mathematics professor who
took the reins of the Faculty Association from Daneshdoost last month.
So many that it makes for another full-time job. Sometimes, Zeman said
his home phone will ring from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m.
Each call is a problem, and each is evidence to Zeman and Daneshdoost
that a rift continues between the administration and the association,
albeit a quieter, calmer rift.
Both admit that times are better and that progress is consistently made
with the administration, but nonetheless, they believe their voices are
not always heard or respected.
"There has been cooperation between the administration and the union,"
Zeman said, adding that despite the look of progress, current
administrators don't always understand the society of SIUC. "We don't
have any continuity [between administrations.] They may have good
intentions, but they don't understand the University's culture. It takes
time to get a handle on it."
Daneshdoost and Zeman both said they don't always believe their
grievances are taken seriously when they are brought to the attention of
the administration. For instance, a faculty member was recently judged
to be "outstanding" by a departmental faculty committee and was
recommended for promotion, Zeman said. The department's dean said no.
A grievance was filed with the administration, and the provost responded
that proof was needed to substantiate the word "outstanding." In the
end, the administration won the battle.
These are the daily conflicts that are sometimes won, sometimes lost,
but almost always leave someone frustrated. On the administrative end,
the picture is somewhat more optimistic.
Sue Davis, spokeswoman for the administration, said the relationship
between the two groups is a healthy one and that Wendler is pleased with
the amount of progress that has been made. While the association and the
administration have different priorities, Davis said that doesn't mean
there is a great disparity. Sometimes, issues just come up, thus is the
life of a large university.
John Dunn, provost and vice chancellor, seems inclined to agree. His
office receives grievances from the Faculty Association, and while some
are deemed large enough to move directly up the ladder to the
chancellor, many are resolved under his supervision.
Dunn said that since the University is so large, "we will never be able
to satisfy everyone," and each grievance is dealt with in a thoughtful
and appropriate manner.
Done Rice, who stepped into the role of Dunn's associate provost two
months ago, reiterated this and said he realizes there is a certain
distance between the two groups. He said he has cordially tried to set
up lunch appointments with Zeman and Daneshdoost, but schedules are
always in conflict and the time can never be made. Despite this, he said
there should be more effort made for the groups to communicate, not just
when the tension is high.
Rice said he would like future negotiations to not be overshadowed by
the ghosts of last year's averted strike.
"I hope future bargaining doesn't carry that baggage," Rice said. "I
hope there's no animosity carrying over."
Animosity, though, does not seem to be an applicable word right now. The
disagreements perceived on both sides of the table are of a more
understated variety right now, and both sides take each individual issue
with its own grain of salt. Regardless, Daneshdoost and Zeman said there
is a lack of understanding and a common goal between the two groups, and
as a result, the communication between them is strained and taken with
fake smiles.
Most of all, Daneshdoost said the issue all boils down to one thing.
"They are in a state of self-denial that we have a union here,"
Daneshdoost said. "We have a common mission here. We should be working
together, not against each other."
[Macro error: Can't include because the file is larger than 32767 characters.]

Today's News | Sports | Voices - Editorial | Letters
Newsbriefs | pulse - Arts & Entertainment | Calendar | Photo Staff
Apts & Rentals | Photo Personals | Live DE NewsCam | Classified Ads
Last update: Friday, October 8, 2004 at 3:38:06 AM Copyright 2009 Daily Egyptian
|