University caps ethics tests
John Henry
Daily Egyptian
This fall University employees have been ethically tested in their
workplaces.
Not because situations demanding ethical questioning arose, but because
it's the law.
In fall 2003, the Illinois government passed the State Officials and
Employees Ethics Act. The act requires all government employees to
either complete an online test or to read and sign a pamphlet concerning
hypothetical ethical dilemmas: bribes and political activity at work and
their solutions.
"I think the primary focus of the training is, really, to make
individuals aware of the ethics act and some components of the ethics
that they may not be aware of as far as the types of activities that are
prohibited," said Brent Patton, the University's Ethics Administrator.
"From an awareness standpoint, the training materials have done that."
University employees were first required to complete the ethics training
the first week in October.
Provost John Dunn said within the first week of the administering the
tests, more than 35 percent of University employees completed the
requirement.
Patton said the University is now at a 99 percent completion rate.
"I would compliment the vice chancellors and the deans and the
department chairs in their efforts to get the word out and to make sure
the employees, under their supervision, did comply," Patton said. "I
think at 99 plus percent, we're in excellent shape here and that's all
due to those folks."
John Wilson, a Politics and Government instructor at Illinois State
University, disagrees with the training and spoke of the supposed flaws
in an article published by the Independent Media Center of
Bloomington-Normal.
Wilson wrote that "the state's training program doesn't deal with any
important ethical issues" and offers no relevance to university
employees.
Patton said he thought the training was initially geared toward
departments like the Illinois Department of Transportation and the
Department of Natural Resources.
Because the focus of the tests were not explicitly for the use of higher
education facilities, there has been some concern the content of the
tests don't correctly apply.
"There were parts of it that, I would think, would be even better if the
nature of the training was more specific to the University and the kinds
of issues that confront us here daily," Dunn said.
According to Patton, the Ethics Act requires the training.
"As far as sanctions are concerned, the State Ethics Commission has the
authority to investigate and fine individuals who are not in compliance
with the law," Patton said. "I believe it's up to $5,000."
Patton said a supervisor could seek disciplinary action against an
individual who chooses not to comply with the ethics training.
"One of the questions that rattles around in my mind about this is how
will we know, at some point, whether this has had any desired change,"
Dunn said. "One thing we do know is that there has probably been more
conversations and discussions about being ethical."
[Macro error: Can't include because the file is larger than 32767 characters.]

Today's News | Sports | Voices - Editorial | Letters
Newsbriefs | pulse - Arts & Entertainment | Calendar | Photo Staff
Apts & Rentals | Photo Personals | Live DE NewsCam | Classified Ads
Last update: Thursday, December 2, 2004 at 4:28:36 AM Copyright 2009 Daily Egyptian
|